[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#171493: marked as done (nase-a60_0.20a-3(unstable/ia64): FTBFS: cannot find -lXaw)



Your message dated Tue, 03 Dec 2002 07:02:17 -0500
with message-id <E18JBkn-0001yo-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#171493: fixed in nase-a60 0.20a-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2002 22:23:57 +0000
>From bdale@gag.com Mon Dec 02 16:23:56 2002
Return-path: <bdale@gag.com>
Received: from winfree.gag.com [192.133.104.8] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18Iyyp-0002UU-00; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 16:23:55 -0600
Received: from spampd.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by winfree.gag.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F08C2E9
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon,  2 Dec 2002 15:23:55 -0700 (MST)
Received: from rover.gag.com (rover.gag.com [192.133.104.32])
	by winfree.gag.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CEB2C2E9
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon,  2 Dec 2002 15:23:54 -0700 (MST)
Received: by rover.gag.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C5A0C43C22; Mon,  2 Dec 2002 17:23:53 -0500 (EST)
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: nase-a60_0.20a-3(unstable/ia64): FTBFS: cannot find -lXaw
From: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 17:23:53 -0500
Message-ID: <87u1hw9i12.fsf@rover.gag.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: nase-a60
Version: 0.20a-3
Severity: serious

This version fails on the ia64 autobuilder as shown below.  I'm betting 
something isn't quite right in the build dependencies?  It appears the package
could use a liberal sprinkling of additional #include lines to fix the various
implicit declarations, too... they're bad news on 64-bit architectures.

Bdale

| Automatic build of nase-a60_0.20a-3 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.169
| Build started at 20021202-0900

[...]

| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4), texinfo, libxaw7-dev, xlibs-dev

[...]

| cc -O2 -g -Wall  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DLIBDIRPATH=\"/usr/share/nase-a60\" -INONE -o xa60 xa60.c -LNONE -lXaw -lXt -lSM -lICE -lXext -lXmu -lX11
| xa60.c: In function `mk_fname':
| xa60.c:116: warning: implicit declaration of function `getpid'
| xa60.c: In function `read_file':
| xa60.c:135: warning: implicit declaration of function `exit'
| xa60.c: In function `is_error_line':
| xa60.c:321: warning: implicit declaration of function `atoi'
| /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXaw
| collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
| make[1]: *** [xa60] Error 1

[...]

A complete build log can be found at
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64&pkg=nase-a60&ver=0.20a-3


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 171493-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2002 12:08:03 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Tue Dec 03 06:08:03 2002
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18JBqN-0007kJ-00; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 06:08:03 -0600
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 18JBkn-0001yo-00; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 07:02:17 -0500
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 171493-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.28 $
Subject: Bug#171493: fixed in nase-a60 0.20a-4
Message-Id: <E18JBkn-0001yo-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 07:02:17 -0500
Delivered-To: 171493-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
nase-a60, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

nase-a60_0.20a-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/n/nase-a60/nase-a60_0.20a-4.diff.gz
nase-a60_0.20a-4.dsc
  to pool/main/n/nase-a60/nase-a60_0.20a-4.dsc
nase-a60_0.20a-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/nase-a60/nase-a60_0.20a-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 171493@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <vela@debian.org> (supplier of updated nase-a60 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  3 Dec 2002 12:51:09 +0100
Source: nase-a60
Binary: nase-a60
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.20a-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
Description: 
 nase-a60   - An Algol-60 interpreter
Closes: 171493 171494
Changes: 
 nase-a60 (0.20a-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * configure.in: No need to check for xmkmf, AC_PATH_X works fine without
     it.  Closes: #171493, #171494.
   * xa60.c: Include <unistd.h>, <sys/types.h> for getpid; <stdlib.h> for
     exit; <string.h> for atoi.
Files: 
 15902a0d71cea52c0f7944d5ad827519 601 interpreters extra nase-a60_0.20a-4.dsc
 f33fc73618f56467108841db641e39dc 6027 interpreters extra nase-a60_0.20a-4.diff.gz
 de1052b6ebbb70f76e070b79a522b87d 169798 interpreters extra nase-a60_0.20a-4_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE97JrOxBYivKllgY8RAnLSAJ9mArwodoUYWNxwdE7LU3k3h2/G3gCfVxIc
iJhmrB0DUphr0YhEeZcYsz4=
=sfhj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: