Bug#154388: marked as done (scrollkeeper: Trying to fetch an unfetchable file on the Internet)
Your message dated 28 Jul 2002 17:41:55 -0400
with message-id <1027892515.29166.42.camel@pisces>
and subject line Fixed in latest upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jul 2002 16:13:32 +0000
>From raphael.halimi@sayanix.com Fri Jul 26 11:13:32 2002
Return-path: <raphael.halimi@sayanix.com>
Received: from sanctuaire.net (aldebaran.inside.sanctuaire.net) [62.4.22.139]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17Y7id-0002Xz-00; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 11:13:31 -0500
Received: from arche (arche.inside.sanctuaire.net [192.168.1.2])
by aldebaran.inside.sanctuaire.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9BA4BB1; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 18:12:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by arche (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B562B3737; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 18:12:56 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: scrollkeeper: Trying to fetch an unfetchable file on the Internet
From: "Raphael HALIMI" <raphael.halimi@sayanix.com>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <submit@bugs.debian.org>
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.49
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 18:12:55 +0200
Message-Id: <20020726161256.B562B3737@arche>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: scrollkeeper
Version: 0.3.11-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid
When upgrading (and installing I think) scrollkeeper, it tries several times to
fetch the file http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.1.2/docbookx.dtd, which
seems not to exist. This produces a consequent loss of time, as it retries
anytime when a file in /usr/share/gnome/help requires this DTD.
It may be related to the Gnome2 packages in experimental, which I installed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux arche 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro
Versions of packages scrollkeeper depends on:
ii docbook-xml 4.1.99really4.2.cr2-1 XML DTD for DocBook, also known as
ii libc6 2.2.5-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libscrollkeeper0 0.3.11-1 Library to load .omf files (runtim
ii libxml2 2.4.23-1 GNOME XML library
ii libxslt1 1.0.18-0.1 XSLT processing library
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-2 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 154388-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 2002 21:41:57 +0000
>From hoserhead@woot.net Sun Jul 28 16:41:57 2002
Return-path: <hoserhead@woot.net>
Received: from (pisces.woot.net) [24.114.58.58] (hosehead)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17YvnZ-0002ef-00; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 16:41:57 -0500
Received: from hosehead by pisces.woot.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17YvnY-0001Aa-00; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 17:41:56 -0400
Subject: Fixed in latest upload
From: Joe Drew <hoserhead@woot.net>
To: 154141-done@bugs.debian.org, 151572-done@bugs.debian.org,
153658-done@bugs.debian.org, 154388-done@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7
Date: 28 Jul 2002 17:41:55 -0400
Message-Id: <1027892515.29166.42.camel@pisces>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Delivered-To: 154388-done@bugs.debian.org
All these bugs are fixed in my latest upload of gnome-utils to
experimental. (I forgot to check the bug list when preparing the
package.)
Thanks for reporting them.
--
Joe Drew <hoserhead@woot.net> <drew@debian.org>
"This particular group of cats is mostly self-herding." -- Bdale Garbee
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: