[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#132168: marked as done (svgalibg1: Files in etc not marked as conffiles)

Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2002 23:34:43 +0000
with message-id <20020203233443.GA1303@arborlon.riva.ucam.org>
and subject line Bug#132168: svgalibg1: Files in etc not marked as conffiles
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 18:37:35 +0000
>From malcolm@ivywell.screaming.net Sun Feb 03 12:37:35 2002
Return-path: <malcolm@ivywell.screaming.net>
Received: from pcow035o.blueyonder.co.uk (blueyonder.co.uk) [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16XRWA-0006Y6-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 12:37:34 -0600
Received: from pcow035o.blueyonder.co.uk ([]) by blueyonder.co.uk  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75);
	 Sun, 3 Feb 2002 18:37:34 +0000
Received: from localhost (unverified []) by pcow035o.blueyonder.co.uk
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.9) with ESMTP id <T58d9b2294cac1785ed1e6@pcow035o.blueyonder.co.uk> for <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>;
 Sun, 3 Feb 2002 18:37:33 +0000
Received: from malcolm by localhost with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16XR1m-0003Sy-00
	for <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 18:06:10 +0000
From: Malcolm Parsons <malcolm@ivywell.screaming.net>
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: svgalibg1: Files in etc not marked as conffiles
Message-Id: <E16XR1m-0003Sy-00@localhost>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 18:06:10 +0000
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org

Package: svgalibg1
Version: 1:1.4.3-2
Severity: Serious
Justification: Policy 11.7

svgalibg1 contains files in /etc that are not marked as conffiles.
This violates a must in Debian Policy, so is a Serious bug.

This is a mass bug submission, and has been discussed on debian-devel
starting at

For details of which files in svgalibg1 are not marked as conffiles see

If your maintainer scripts modify these files, they must not be shipped
in the package.

If your maintainer scripts do not modify these files then they must be marked
as conffiles.

Example configuration files should be placed in 

See Debian Policy 11.7 for more information.

Received: (at 132168-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 23:34:52 +0000
>From cjwatson@flatline.org.uk Sun Feb 03 17:34:52 2002
Return-path: <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
Received: from gadolinium.btinternet.com [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16XW9r-0005GY-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 17:34:52 -0600
Received: from host217-35-46-184.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([] helo=arborlon.lab.dotat.at)
	by gadolinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
	id 16XW9q-00010a-00
	for 132168-done@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 23:34:50 +0000
Received: from cjwatson by arborlon.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16XW9j-0000LB-00
	for <132168-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 23:34:43 +0000
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 23:34:43 +0000
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
To: 132168-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#132168: svgalibg1: Files in etc not marked as conffiles
Message-ID: <20020203233443.GA1303@arborlon.riva.ucam.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Sender: Colin Watson <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
Delivered-To: 132168-done@bugs.debian.org

This bug doesn't apply to the current version of svgalibg1 (fixed in
1:1.4.3-3, I believe). Since svgalibg1 is now orphaned, I'm closing

While I appreciate you arranging that people actually pay attention to
this, would you mind checking against a real mirror? I suspect I'm going
to have to go and do all of that now ...


Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]

Reply to: