[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#130965: marked as done (Long description line)

Your message dated Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
with message-id <E16XSyp-0004MU-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#130965: fixed in rmc 20010628CVS-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2002 15:09:15 +0000
>From yotam@makif.omer.k12.il Sat Jan 26 09:09:15 2002
Return-path: <yotam@makif.omer.k12.il>
Received: from (mail.makif.omer.k12.il) [] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16UUSA-00066u-00; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 09:09:15 -0600
Received: from [] (helo=insomnia17)
	by mail.makif.omer.k12.il with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 16UUS8-00064a-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 17:09:12 +0200
Received: from yotam by insomnia17 with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16UUS6-0000ic-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 17:09:10 +0200
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
From: Yotam Rubin <yotam@makif.omer.k12.il>
Subject: Long description line
Message-Id: <E16UUS6-0000ic-00@insomnia17>
Sender: Yotam Rubin <yotam@makif.omer.k12.il>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 17:09:10 +0200
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: librmc
Version: 20010628CVS-3.2
Severity: minor


The long description contains a line whose length is greater than 81 characters,
causing the description to render in an ugly fashion on some frontends.
Line 4 is the problematic line.

	Thanks, Yotam Rubin

P.S.: This bug report has been automatically generated. I apologize if a bug
      pertaining to this problem has already been filed.

Received: (at 130965-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 20:23:03 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Sun Feb 03 14:23:03 2002
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16XTAF-0000oT-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 14:23:03 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16XSyp-0004MU-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
To: 130965-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.68 $
Subject: Bug#130965: fixed in rmc 20010628CVS-5
Message-Id: <E16XSyp-0004MU-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
Delivered-To: 130965-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rmc, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

  to pool/main/r/rmc/librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rmc/librmc_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc-binaries_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc_20010628CVS-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc_20010628CVS-5.dsc

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 130965@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> (supplier of updated rmc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)

Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  2 Feb 2002 20:30:04 +0000
Source: rmc
Binary: librmc-dev rmc-binaries librmc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 20010628CVS-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
 librmc     - Remote method call
 librmc-dev - Remote method call (development files)
 rmc-binaries - Remote method call (common binaries)
Closes: 125026 125320 129117 130965
 rmc (20010628CVS-5) unstable; urgency=low
   * QA upload.
   * Various fixes for g++-3 (closes: #129117):
     - configure.in: Just check whether libstdc++ is there (by checking for
       main()) rather than trying to check for cout, as there doesn't appear
       to be any simple way to get 'using namespace std;' into the check.
     - src/Demos/Chat/Server/Chat_s.h: Use 'friend class foo', not 'friend
   * Rewrite descriptions in proper English (closes: #125026, #125320).
   * Don't use long lines in librmc's description (closes: #130965).
   * Use dh_installman rather than dh_installmanpages, so that man pages
     don't end up in all three binary packages. Build-depend on debhelper 3
     to get this, although DH_COMPAT is still set to 2.
 18cfa0d4827ccc444eced31bf1e040fa 693 libs optional rmc_20010628CVS-5.dsc
 bb0cff15129de7b3cbdc5245bdcb766e 34396 libs optional rmc_20010628CVS-5.diff.gz
 db8d8811d5f1199a0891a1a358fd31fd 40490 libs optional librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
 541203915e32553010de66ee3a32ecfe 31766 libs optional librmc_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
 5d28fb5931d0c3c9bf3d55a43675d1e7 26110 libs optional rmc-binaries_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb

Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> -- Debian developer


Reply to: