[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#126447: marked as done (kmozilla: couple of dependency issues)



Your message dated Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:45 +0100
with message-id <20020127225245.A27161@fisch.cyrius.com>
and subject line Package kmozilla removed from Debian unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 2001 21:20:57 +0000
>From RossBoylan@stanfordalumni.org Tue Dec 25 15:20:57 2001
Return-path: <RossBoylan@stanfordalumni.org>
Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (avocet.prod.itd.earthlink.net) [207.217.120.50] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16Iz0L-0002ZA-00; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 15:20:57 -0600
Received: from sdn-ar-001casfrmp136.dialsprint.net ([158.252.208.138] helo=wheat.dslnorthwest.net)
	by avocet.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 16Iz0G-00047x-00; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 13:20:53 -0800
Received: from ross by wheat.dslnorthwest.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16Iz0E-0001ZK-00; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 13:20:50 -0800
From: Ross Boylan <RossBoylan@stanfordalumni.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: kmozilla: couple of dependency issues
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.36
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.36
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 13:20:50 -0800
CC: drrboylan@earthlink.net
Message-Id: <E16Iz0E-0001ZK-00@wheat.dslnorthwest.net>
Sender: Ross Boylan <RossBoylan@stanfordalumni.org>
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org

Package: kmozilla
Version: N/A; reported 2001-12-25
Severity: wishlist

kmozilla depends on mozilla.  The comments indicate the only part it
embeds is the browser.  Would it be more appropriate to depend on
mozilla-browser?  That way people who don't have all the trimmings
of mozilla (e.g., me) will be able to use it.

Also, I notice there is a python script in the admin subdirectory.
Perhaps a build-depends on some flavor of python is in order.


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux wheat 2.4.16 #1 Sun Dec 16 22:15:54 PST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 126447-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2002 21:52:57 +0000
>From tbm@cyrius.com Sun Jan 27 15:52:57 2002
Return-path: <tbm@cyrius.com>
Received: from gtso-c3477b5b.dsl.mediaways.net (mail.frosty-geek.net) [195.71.123.91] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16UxEP-0006tD-00; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:52:57 -0600
Received: from nautilus.noreply.org (unknown [138.232.34.77])
	by mail.frosty-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E2E9F46C081; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by nautilus.noreply.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
	id 6B341357C6; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by fisch.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id BABD522BB2; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:45 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:45 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: 115987-done@bugs.debian.org, 126447-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Package kmozilla removed from Debian unstable
Message-ID: <20020127225245.A27161@fisch.cyrius.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
Delivered-To: 126447-done@bugs.debian.org

The package kmozilla has been removed from Debian unstable and won't
be released as part of the next Debian release, woody (version 3.0).
I'm therefore closing all its open bugs.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.

Best regards,

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com



Reply to: