[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#123109: marked as done (linuxconf_1.26r4-1 fails to build on hppa)



Your message dated Mon, 31 Dec 2001 15:08:29 -0500
with message-id <E16L8jV-000084-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#123109: fixed in linuxconf 1.26r4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2001 18:17:06 +0000
>From randolph@tausq.org Sun Dec 09 12:17:06 2001
Return-path: <randolph@tausq.org>
Received: from pxofc151-phx1.pangeatech.com (mail.pangeatech.com) [63.110.32.151] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16D8Ve-00030k-00; Sun, 09 Dec 2001 12:17:06 -0600
Received: from [65.192.22.133] by mail.pangeatech.com (NTMail 7.00.0018/NU8172.00.e2123c13) with ESMTP id qovnjaaa for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 11:11:46 -0700
Received: from randolph by gandalf.tausq.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 16D8VY-0004PL-00; Sun, 09 Dec 2001 10:17:00 -0800
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 10:17:00 -0800
From: Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: linuxconf_1.26r4-1 fails to build on hppa
Message-ID: <20011209181700.GO1515@tausq.org>
Reply-To: Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
X-PGP: for PGP key, see http://www.tausq.org/pgp.txt
X-GPG: for GPG key, see http://www.tausq.org/gpg.txt
Sender: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: linuxconf
Version: 1.26r4-1
Severity: important

http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=linuxconf&ver=1.26r4-1&arch=hppa&stamp=1006070903&file=log&as=raw

In file included from configf.cc:12:
../userconf/userconf.h:123: friend declaration requires class-key, i.e.
`friend 
   class USERPRIVI_COMNG'
../userconf/userconf.h:398: friend declaration requires class-key, i.e. `friend 
   class GROUPS'


randolph
-- 
Debian Developer <tausq@debian.org>
http://www.TauSq.org/

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 123109-close) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2001 20:23:56 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Mon Dec 31 14:23:56 2001
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16L8yS-0008Rz-00; Mon, 31 Dec 2001 14:23:56 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16L8jV-000084-00; Mon, 31 Dec 2001 15:08:29 -0500
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
To: 123109-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.66 $
Subject: Bug#123109: fixed in linuxconf 1.26r4-2
Message-Id: <E16L8jV-000084-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 15:08:29 -0500
Delivered-To: 123109-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linuxconf, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linuxconf-dev_1.26r4-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/linuxconf/linuxconf-dev_1.26r4-2_i386.deb
linuxconf-i18n_1.26r4-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/linuxconf/linuxconf-i18n_1.26r4-2_all.deb
linuxconf_1.26r4-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linuxconf/linuxconf_1.26r4-2.diff.gz
linuxconf_1.26r4-2.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linuxconf/linuxconf_1.26r4-2.dsc
linuxconf_1.26r4-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/linuxconf/linuxconf_1.26r4-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 123109@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> (supplier of updated linuxconf package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 19:15:05 +0000
Source: linuxconf
Binary: linuxconf-i18n linuxconf-dev linuxconf
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.26r4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
Description: 
 linuxconf  - a powerful Linux administration kit
 linuxconf-dev - Development files for Linuxconf
 linuxconf-i18n - international language files for Linuxconf
Closes: 123109 126770
Changes: 
 linuxconf (1.26r4-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Fix build on hppa (thanks, LaMont Jones; closes: #123109, #126770).
   * Install man pages only in the linuxconf package, as otherwise
     linuxconf-dev is uninstallable.
   * Similarly, install undocumented(7) symlinks for tlcc and tlproto only in
     the linuxconf-dev package.
   * Add appropriate Replaces: to sort out upgrades for all this.
Files: 
 1bfd3cb320f3d59cb0e20cb172656ccc 767 admin optional linuxconf_1.26r4-2.dsc
 87ace0913ea10d9cf4e10e7b77d8c2bb 14738 admin optional linuxconf_1.26r4-2.diff.gz
 0f34c6ae28e7a4aa4c1a26dc05bff440 3478220 admin optional linuxconf-i18n_1.26r4-2_all.deb
 2dbf17bb2dd01419d4a3258215874506 3340194 admin optional linuxconf_1.26r4-2_i386.deb
 369f1a8f49db00d13b079fdea88db479 459364 devel optional linuxconf-dev_1.26r4-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8L3MZ9t0zAhD6TNERAkMgAJ9Ojrfx+9Yg7D9hojCTsd5tzmEpUwCeITQZ
lfi3kmDEi5z9oFZoFnI1l+I=
=p7lk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: