[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#121697: marked as done (mpg123: Man page in /usr/man, not /usr/share/man)



Your message dated Fri, 28 Dec 2001 00:30:53 +0000
with message-id <20011228003053.GA28467@arborlon.riva.ucam.org>
and subject line mpg123 0.59r-10 is now in testing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2001 09:38:10 +0000
>From anthony@asd.ppp0.com Thu Nov 29 03:38:10 2001
Return-path: <anthony@asd.ppp0.com>
Received: from 24-163-106-43.he2.cox.rr.com (asd.ppp0.com) [24.163.106.43] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 169Ndx-0003hx-00; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 03:38:09 -0600
Received: from bohr.local ([192.168.65.5] helo=localhost)
	by asd.ppp0.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 169Ndh-00031O-00; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 04:37:53 -0500
Received: from anthony by localhost with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
	id 169Nde-0000Mt-00; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 04:37:53 -0500
From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: mpg123: Man page in /usr/man, not /usr/share/man
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.36
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.36
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 04:37:50 -0500
Message-Id: <E169Nde-0000Mt-00@localhost>
Sender: Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@bohr.local>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: mpg123
Version: 0.59q-2
Severity: normal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

mpg123 is one of the only five man pages left in /usr/man ... 

- -- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bohr 2.4.16 #2 SMP Wed Nov 28 05:25:00 EST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages mpg123 depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.2.4-5    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8BgHx5lsmI6uA7bQRAl2yAKCU75WefXpQUS6XQIbiTBH7SWPFDgCfWPCl
zVTvodV2dwc/QOFbxpehr0k=
=AIS3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 121697-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2001 00:32:56 +0000
>From cjwatson@flatline.org.uk Thu Dec 27 18:32:56 2001
Return-path: <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
Received: from rhenium.btinternet.com (rhenium) [194.73.73.93] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16JkxD-000238-00; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 18:32:56 -0600
Received: from host217-35-36-148.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.35.36.148] helo=arborlon.riva.ucam.org)
	by rhenium with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
	id 16JkxC-0007F9-00; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 00:32:54 +0000
Received: from cjwatson by arborlon.riva.ucam.org with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16JkvF-0007PV-00; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 00:30:53 +0000
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 00:30:53 +0000
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
To: 57220-done@bugs.debian.org, 112240-done@bugs.debian.org,
	121697-done@bugs.debian.org, 124193-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: mpg123 0.59r-10 is now in testing
Message-ID: <20011228003053.GA28467@arborlon.riva.ucam.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
Sender: Colin Watson <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
Delivered-To: 121697-done@bugs.debian.org

Hi,

mpg123 0.59r-10 is now (finally) in testing, so these bugs no longer
apply:

   #57220: -DREAD_MMAP was removed in 0.59r-5.
  #112240: -w/--wav was documented in 0.59r-7.
  #121697: mpg123 moved to the FHS in 0.59r-1.
  #124193: Ditto.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]



Reply to: