Re: About canonical Vcs fields
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org> wrote:
> Thanks for bringing up this subject.
>
> I use svn.d.o everywhere, I don't like the new ones. However, the thing I
> don't like much more is inconsistency: some packages use svn.d.o, some
> anonscm.d.o, and some mixture of the two... Ugh. I don't mind switching if
> we switch everything at once. I'm happy to make the mass-commit if there's
> consensus that this is the right to do.
I don't have anything against a mass-commit, it looks like others
don't as well. And Dmitrijs provided a good technical rationale... so
please do it :)
> The main reason I wanted this sorted out is that currently lintian4python
> gives suggestions regarding Vcs-* that are inconsistent with what Lintian
> proper considers "correct":
> https://bitbucket.org/jwilk/lintian4python/src/0.16/checks/python/teams
Let's keep things consistent, and change it to match lintian.
--
Dmitry Shachnev
Reply to: