Re: Sympy 0.7.2
What was the MathJax complain about? I maybe can help you with that.
--
Dmitry Shachnev
On 10/28/12, Thomas Kluyver <thomas@kluyver.me.uk> wrote:
> On 28 October 2012 08:47, Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org> wrote:
>
>> I assume that building the binary packages from a single source package
>>>> is preferred?
>>>>
>>> sympy devs reckon we should use the separate release tarballs. Is that
>>> acceptable for Debian?
>>>
>>
>> Yes.
>
>
> OK. I've committed the minor changes (diff attached) to update the Python 2
> package to 0.7.2. I tried to add a -docs package with the Sphinx docs, but
> it complained about Mathjax, so I've left it for now. If that sounds OK,
> could someone upload it?
>
> Also attached is the new packaging for the Python 3 version. This now calls
> the script isympy3. Is it OK to svn-inject this? And is python3-sympy the
> right name to use for the SVN directory?
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
>
Reply to: