Re: Python 2.6 in unstable

[Ludovic Rousseau <ludovic.rousseau@gmail.com>]

2009/11/14 Jakub Wilk <ubanus@users.sf.net>:
> * Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org>, 2009-11-14, 01:29:
>>
>> After rebuilding most packages that build depend on
>> python-all{,-dev,-dbg}[0], I reported few more bugs. Packages that
>> didn't FTBFS but ship files in /usr/local are now listed on that page as
>> well (with "usr-local" usertag).
>>
>> If someone wants to help with checking build logs and reporting bugs,
>> please download failed.tar.xz from [1] and file bugs for packages
>> not listed on tiny.pl/hqwjz yet.
>
> I've triaged most of these build failures.
>
> 1) These packages fail in sid, too:
>
>   clientcookie dynagen euca2ools pyspi python-bibtex python-clientform
> python-dmidecode python-mechanize qtiplot wxwidgets2.8
>
> Bugs are already filed. (Maybe we should usertag them python2.6 anyway?)
>
> 2) These packages failed because of (temporarily?) broken build-deps:
>
>   gnuradio libkate petsc4py pycg python-kde3 subversion
>
> 3) These packages failed likely because one of build-deps didn't support
> python2.6:
>
>   babel jppy pyexiv2 pymvpa pysparse python-biopython python-edje
> python-qt4 renpy tagpy creoleparser kaa-imlib2 pygtk pynifti pysvn
> python-chaco python-enable python-scipy revelation   twisted-calendarserver
> freej kaa-metadata pyicu pyqwt3d pytables   python-djvulibre python-evas
> pyvorbis swftools html5lib necpp   pykaraoke pyqwt5 pytagsfs python-ecore
> python-qt3 qscintilla2 symeig
>
> 4) These are probably real python2.6-related failures:
>
> 4.1) These packages seems to hardcode a Python version somewhere:
>
>   boost1.38 boost1.39 boost1.40 distribute libkml polybori pykcs11
> python-bsddb3 python-multiprocessing python-stdlib-extensions

pykcs11: fixed in 1.2.1-3 I just uploaded to unstable.

Bye

-- 
 Dr. Ludovic Rousseau