Le lundi 16 mars 2009 à 14:08 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> 3. GNOME-PYTHON-EXTRAS
>
> What is happening in unstable:
> * egg.trayicon, gtkhtml2 and gtkmozembed each have their own
> binary package (python-eggtrayicon, python-gtkhtml2,
> python-gtkmozembed)
> * gksu 1.X is going away (nothing uses it anyway)
> * gda is going away, at least for a while
> * gtkspell will have its own binary package (currently in NEW)
>
> What will change upstream:
> * It’s very hard to tell, these modules don’t seem to change much.
> * Most of them have better replacements, so other packages should
> really get of these dependencies anyway.
>
> What changes to apply to Debian packages:
> * To simplify the dependency tree, the dependencies of
> python-gnome2-extras on python-eggtrayicon, python-gtkhtml2 and
> python-gtkmozembed are going away, probably right after the
> squeeze release.
> * Therefore, packages using these modules *must* be updated to use
> the new binary package as dependency instead.
Apparently, developers have a strong tendency to not fix these bugs the
correct way and instead, to make packages depend on e.g.
python-gtkmozembed | python-gnome2-extras
Therefore, I’m probably going to make gnome-python-extras follow the
gnome-python-desktop path:
* the gksu2 and gdl modules will go in python-gksu2 and python-gdl
* when gda comes back (Gustavo is working on packaging libgda4),
it will be in python-gda
* let’s take that opportunity to ditch egg.recent away
Are people OK with this approach?
--
.''`. Debian 5.0 "Lenny" has been released!
: :' :
`. `' Last night, Darth Vader came down from planet Vulcan and told
`- me that if you don't install Lenny, he'd melt your brain.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=