On ven, 2008-04-04 at 10:48 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > I was hoping is that if python is subsequently installed, that python > itself would run the rtupdate scripts. This doesn't seem to be the > case. Should it be? If not, how should I handle the situation where > libboost-dbg is installed/configured prior to python being installed? It seems indeed like a good idea to run them when python is first installed, so that is clearly a limitation of the current python-defaults rtupdate mechanism. On the other hand, I’m not sure such symbolic links are necessary for debugging libraries; at least they are not for usual libraries. > P.S. As you and Sune suggested, I'll change libboost-python-dev to > depend on python-dev. Thanks for all your work to improve the boost/python situation. Cheers, -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=