Re: Bug#486654: adonthell: FTBFS on arm and armel

To: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Cc: 486654@bugs.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#486654: adonthell: FTBFS on arm and armel
From: peter green <plugwash@p10link.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:47:07 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 488D170B.5090305@p10link.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080728003810.GA20129@deprecation.cyrius.com>
References: <4858150D.7040200@p10link.net> <[🔎] 20080727222044.GA15828@deprecation.cyrius.com> <[🔎] 20080728003810.GA20129@deprecation.cyrius.com>



Anyway, given that 0.3.4.cvs.20050813-3 compiled but
0.3.4.cvs.20050813-4 didn't, I guess this is somehow related to
gcc-4.3.

It looks like the default python version also changed between the twobuilds from 2.4 to 2.5 so that would be a suspect too.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#486654: adonthell: FTBFS on arm and armel
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>

References:
- Re: Bug#486654: adonthell: FTBFS on arm and armel
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Re: Bug#486654: adonthell: FTBFS on arm and armel
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#486654: adonthell: FTBFS on arm and armel
Next by Date: Re: Bug#486654: adonthell: FTBFS on arm and armel
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#486654: adonthell: FTBFS on arm and armel
Next by thread: Re: Bug#486654: adonthell: FTBFS on arm and armel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread