On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 12:02 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 12:47:34AM +0000, Richard Hecker wrote: > > Does the project want to say that a DM is less trustworthy than a DD? > Yes, obviously. Just like a DM is more trustworthy than a non-DM. It would be more accurate to say that a DD is more *trusted* than a DM, and a DM is more *trusted* than a contributor who has neither status. We hope that our application processes exclude most of those who are not trustworthy, but we can't be sure. Ben. > > Should a DM becoming a DD be viewed as a promotion? > But it is, isn't it? Or, at least, as a next step. > -- Ben Hutchings Design a system any fool can use, and only a fool will want to use it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part