Hello, On Fri 04 Jan 2019 at 05:29pm GMT, Ulrike Uhlig wrote: >> Exactly. I understand Ulrike's practical concerns but do not consider >> them to outweigh the need to avoid permanency. Even writing "possible >> CoC violation" could hurt someone twenty years down the line. > > Ack. I have no strong opinion on this detail and trust your judgement to > find a possibility that would satisfy concerns of transparency while > being respectful to privacy. I've added a note to the wiki page about this. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature