On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:56:12AM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > I really also see a strong imbalance between various parts of the > project. On the one hand, there is a non-free section that holds > non-free software, ready to be installed by users at will. Then, there > is you (and probably others) argumenting in favour of placing everyday > communication in the hands of companies which are proven to not respect > freedom. But on the other hand, we do care a lot about CDM/EME being > stripped out of the Firefox code just because some people do not like > DRM Do we? Who is this "we"? > (neither do I, but if it is ok to route our *global* communication > through Google, why isn't it ok to route my *local* streaming through > CDM code, and not even leaving that decision up to me? > Really - please fight for freedom on all ends, or at least align your > views about accepting non-freedom on all ends. Indeed. The "freeness before usefulness" attitude preached by RMS is a serious problem in my opinion and I'm glad not all of Debian contributors share it, even though it's often used to influence decisions in Debian. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature