Re: Maximum term for tech ctte members

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Michael Gilbert writes ("Re: Maximum term for tech ctte members"):
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > I don't think this achieves the goal of rotating more project members
> > through the TC.
> 
> You could rotate people in to serve in place of the TC members that
> are on sabbatical, which means at least one new perspective per year.

I really don't like the idea of having two tiers of TC members -
"permanent" ones and these new rotating one-year ones.

Ian.