Re: Maximum term for tech ctte members

[Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>]

On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 01:07:11AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> - continuity is valuable in a body like the tech-ctte, where there
>   aren't that many decisions on a yearly basis (and hence, for instance,
>   it takes time to get new members up to speed). 

You could get continuity by having past members continue to participate
in tech ctte discussions; they just wouldn't get a vote in the outcome...

Also, new ctte members could have been participating in ctte discussions
previously (or just general Debian development issues on -devel, -policy,
etc), so they kind-of should be mostly up to speed already. Keith
was appointed in December, and engaged in the init system question by
January, eg.

Cheers,
aj