Re: Debian Services Census
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:14:13AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote:
> > Unfortunately I have a problem with the renaming of my pet service
> > Buildd.Net on https://wiki.debian.org/Services. I added my service as
> > BuilddNet and it got renamed to "UnofficialBuilddNet". Although it's
> > true that it's an unofficial service, I feel great discomfort with the
> > prefix "Unofficial". No other service has this prefix and I sense
> > disadvantage (not to say: discrimination) about the stigma of being
> > named the only "Unofficial" service on that page. So I propose either
> > the removal of "Unofficial" from the title "UnofficialBuilddNet" to
> > "BuilddNet" or "Buildd.Net" or adding tags "official" and "unofficial"
> > for each service so that everyone can differentiate between unofficial
> > and official services by using a filter or such. But I really object
> > against being the only service named "Unofficial".
>
> I don't have a strong opinion about the addition/removal of this prefix
> but I'd like to point out that contrary to other services, this one
> reuses the "buildd" keyword which is already associated to
> buildd.debian.org and it's a service which duplicates features
> with an already existing service.
Calling it BuilddNet should be quite sufficient for that purpose.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
Reply to: