[DEP 12] Discussion follows on debian-qa.

To: debian-project@lists.debian.org, debian-blends@lists.debian.org
Subject: [DEP 12] Discussion follows on debian-qa.
From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:24:33 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 20130105082433.GD22490@falafel.plessy.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20130104090535.GA30703@enricozini.org> <[🔎] 87a9spsrd5.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <[🔎] CAKTje6F9b4babC3HDobRKYW=-mooGL1AznRMdresQobncA-ORA@mail.gmail.com> <20130103215526.GN30539@jadzia.comodo.priv.at> <20130103190657.GA19361@an3as.eu> <[🔎] 87k3ruyzhn.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <[🔎] 20130103163425.GA19443@enricozini.org> <[🔎] CAKTje6FN7ER11e7Q8hSPzyVWn6_H6q2dEM2rp=SDhMh5Fh3Nrg@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20130103155756.GA29143@gaara.hadrons.org> <[🔎] 20130103072801.GC28636@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com> <[🔎] CAKTje6FJON=rN3mR2chvzY+Jk4H+Ck_Bc8ek28qasHWGJUKLbQ@mail.gmail.com>

Many thanks everybody for your comments.

I have answered in three separate messages on the debian-qa mailign list.

 * [DEP 12] Why chosing YAML.
   https://lists.debian.org/20130105071654.GA22490@falafel.plessy.net

 * [DEP 12]: Why debian/upstream and not debian/control.
   https://lists.debian.org/20130105074720.GB22490@falafel.plessy.net

 * [DEP 12] Relation with DEP 11.
   https://lists.debian.org/20130105081638.GC22490@falafel.plessy.net

Have a nice week-end,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan

Reply to:

References:
- Re: DEP 12: Per-package machine-readable metadata about Upstream
  - From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: DEP 12: Per-package machine-readable metadata about Upstream
Next by Date: kernel not found
Previous by thread: Re: DEP 12: Per-package machine-readable metadata about Upstream
Next by thread: For those who care about statistics created by the team metrics GSoC project
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread