On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 07:30:34AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:36:00AM -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 04:11:49PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > I also noted that in the description of the Format field, it is written > > > “Required in header paragraphs”, but the such information is not given in > > > similar cases, for instance the Files field. Perhaps this could be > > > normalised. > > Agreed. The simplest way to normalize is to drop the comment in the > > description of the Format field, since that's an artifact of my earlier > > thinking on how to structure this. Do you agree, or do you think we should > > instead add this information to all of the field definitions? If the > > latter, would you be willing to provide a patch? > I would prefer to drop the comment. This would give the DEP a more similar > structure as in the Policy's chapter 5, that defines the syntax of control > files. Ok, committed to the repo. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature