Re: infrastructure team rules
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:29:08PM +0200]:
> > > Which teams do you currently have in mind? That applies to DSA,
> > > obviously, ftp-master, but also well-functionning teams such as the
> > > release team?
> > > But it could also apply to every team that has a unix group, even if
> > > it's used to maintain a very small part of Debian infrastructure.
> >
> > Yes. They should all have a mechanism to stop them from calcifying.
>
> I really don't think that the qa group, the webwml group, the list
> admins, etc need such bureaucracy ... According to your definition, your
> proposal apply to them too (they have a unix group, and have access to
> resources in ways other than the standard practice).
I agree here with Lucas - You could even extend this (ok, by waiving
the "unix group" requirement, which is implementation-specific and
thus not exactly great for policy) to Alioth teams or whatnot. IMHO,
"infrastructure teams" should be explicitly enumerated.
--
Gunnar Wolf - gwolf@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
Reply to: