Re: BREAKING NEWS: Debian developers aren't trusted
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 05:09:56AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:04:26AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 06:56:01PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > > Um, the only archs that don't meet the redundancy requirement today are i386
> > > > > and ia64.
> > > > http://release.debian.org/etch_arch_qualify.html says alpha, amd64, arm,
> > > > hppa, i386, ia64, and m68k don't meet it, fwiw.
> > > Oops. Updated with more current info.
> > Sadly, you missed the archive coverage for m68k. See
> > http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-week-big.png or
> > http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-quarter-big.png to see that m68k is
> > ~98% uptodate for a long time now.
> I didn't bother syncing up any of those numbers. None of them are so far
> off to actually matter.
Ah, sorry, my fault... I interpreted your prior mail as intention to keep
all archs uptodate on that page, not only selected archs. Silly me,
believing that being below 98% was one of the reason of not being counted as
an release arch...
But interested point of view...
Ciao... // Fon: 0381-2744150
Ingo \X/ SIP: firstname.lastname@example.org
gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc