[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Social Committee proposal text (diff)



On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 05:08:09PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > + If there are fewer than S2 candidates
> > +  at the end of the nomination period, then the nomination period is
> > +  extended for two further weeks, repeatedly if necessary.</li>
> [..]
> > +  <li>If "None Of The Above" wins the election, or if fewer than S2
> > +  candidates win over "None of the Above", the election process is
> > +  repeated.</li>
> > +
> > +  <li>At least one third of all elected candidates should have been
> > +  members of the project for at least Y/2 years, where Y is the age
> > +  of the Project in years. If fewer than one third of candidates meet
> > +  this requirement, the election process is repeated.</li>
> 
> How often should the nomination period and the election process be
> repeated? I'd suggest to include some maximum otherwise they could go
> on ad infinitum.

You can see similar rules in other parts of the constitution, see 5.2.4,
5.2.6.

Do you think it's likely for it to go on for more than one repetition?

-- 
     2. That which causes joy or happiness.



Reply to: