Re: new queue process tweaks
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:50:32 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> said:
> [Manoj Srivastava]
>> A number of message sent to the secretary are discarded without
>> comment. Does the project really want the secretary to be
>> responding viagra ads?
> Were did you get that idea? You must have read something out of my
> text that was never intended. Even the Norwegian government
> responds to non-directed advertisements. I've never heard the
> government report any problems separating the real requests from
> junk mail. Do you expect the secretary of Debian having problems
> separating the two? Personally, I trust the secretary to be able to
> separate junk mail from real requests.
Ah, if you stipulate that the secretary has the judgement to
figure out what is a "real request" as opposed to junk, I have no
objections. I also sometimes treat a CC: to secretary@d.o as
advisory, or informative, when other (more relevant) rol e addresses
are where the mail was sent to.
manoj
--
"Tourists -- have some fun with New york's hard-boiled cabbies. When
you get to your destination, say to your driver, "Pay? I was
hitchhiking."-- David Letterman
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: