[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GFDL freedoms



On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:22:22PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 09:51:07PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> > Given the above I don't really see any real difference of a tarball with a 
> > docbook and included pictures/graphs/,... and an Openoffice doc. 
> > Why on earth would we want to exclude openoffice docs (provided that the 
> > contents is licensed freely?)
> 
> We don't, that's the whole point. The FDL definition of 'transparent' is
> so broken that it excludes OOo docs.

How does this affect distributors?

--Adam

-- 
Adam McKenna  <adam@debian.org>  <adam@flounder.net>



Reply to: