Re: GFDL freedoms
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:22:22PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 09:51:07PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> > Given the above I don't really see any real difference of a tarball with a
> > docbook and included pictures/graphs/,... and an Openoffice doc.
> > Why on earth would we want to exclude openoffice docs (provided that the
> > contents is licensed freely?)
>
> We don't, that's the whole point. The FDL definition of 'transparent' is
> so broken that it excludes OOo docs.
How does this affect distributors?
--Adam
--
Adam McKenna <adam@debian.org> <adam@flounder.net>
Reply to: