Re: GFDL freedoms
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 09:51:07PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> Given the above I don't really see any real difference of a tarball with a
> docbook and included pictures/graphs/,... and an Openoffice doc.
> Why on earth would we want to exclude openoffice docs (provided that the
> contents is licensed freely?)
We don't, that's the whole point. The FDL definition of 'transparent' is
so broken that it excludes OOo docs.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
Reply to: