On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 09:51:07PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > er, are you aware that an openoffice document is basically a zip file of a > coupple of xml documents (plus included pictures if any)? > -> you definately /can/ edit them in a generic text editor, in fact I've > done so twice in the past (couple of years back now) If your 'generic text editor' is emacs, you can edit anything in it, since it has a hex editor. That doesn't constitute a Transparent copy for the purposes of the GFDL, and nor does the word xml format or an openoffice document. > Why on earth would we want to exclude openoffice docs (provided that the > contents is licensed freely?) I have no idea what your motives might be for your actions. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature