Re: non-free but distributable packages and kernel firmware
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 12:08:05AM +0000, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 01:17:02AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > fsf-free
>
> Should this rather be GFDL-free ??
I read it more like 'Give me what the FSF thinks is Free'. Narrowing it
down to the GFDL would needlessly lessen the scope and be more
suggestive. What does "GFDL-free" mean, anyway?
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
mbanck@debian.org
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
Reply to: