* Andrew Pollock (apollock@debian.org) wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:43:13PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > No, that's d-d-a, just get around the name issue (ie: ignore it/get over > > it/whatever) and use it, just don't abuse it. > > > > But there's arguably a lot of non-developers subscribed to d-d-a as well... Uninteresting and unimportant unless it's something that *only* developers should see and then it could be something for d-p but that should be a *very* rare case indeed and not what was under discussion from my understanding. Non-developers subscribe to d-d-a to hear & follow DD stuff. I don't see there as being any reason for them to piss & moan about there being DD stuff on d-d-a, that's just plain silly. Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature