* Daniel Ruoso (daniel@ruoso.com) wrote: > On the other side, d-d-a is a list which has a very low traffic, and > certainly almost every developer see the posts in d-d-a, but... not > every email that intends to reach all developers is appropriate to d-d-a > since it's not allways an announce. > > So, thinking about all of this, I have a question... > > Isn't a public mailing list (with public logs), but moderated to > @debian.org posters, a possible solution to the current misuse of > debian-private? No, that's d-d-a, just get around the name issue (ie: ignore it/get over it/whatever) and use it, just don't abuse it. Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature