[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Thinking about (mis)use of -private



* Daniel Ruoso (daniel@ruoso.com) wrote:
> On the other side, d-d-a is a list which has a very low traffic, and
> certainly almost every developer see the posts in d-d-a, but... not
> every email that intends to reach all developers is appropriate to d-d-a
> since it's not allways an announce.
> 
> So, thinking about all of this, I have a question...
> 
> Isn't a public mailing list (with public logs), but moderated to
> @debian.org posters, a possible solution to the current misuse of
> debian-private?

No, that's d-d-a, just get around the name issue (ie: ignore it/get over
it/whatever) and use it, just don't abuse it.

	Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: