Re: New policy for http://www.debian.org/consultants/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Tobias Toedter wrote:
| On Thursday 10 February 2005 19:42, Luk Claes wrote:
|>>I've removed the controversal bits (website and nearest city) from the
|>>policy. Would this version be alright to use?
|>No, because than the 'Some parts of the consultant's information can be
|>removed if they don't comply with this policy anymore.' is too weak
|>unless there is mentioned that the consultant with an URL has to explain
|>his/her consultant work on that URL, IMHO.
| should we just drop that part as well, then? Or do you have another
Sorry for the late reply (this message went to the wrong folder...).
I would change it to
"Some parts (or all) of the consultant's information can be removed if
it doesn't comply with this policy anymore or on the maintainers'
PS: Hopefully this is (one of the very) last changes ;-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----