On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 11:57:20PM +1300, Nick Phillips wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 05:24:25PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 02:41:06PM +0100, Tobias Toedter wrote:
> > > 3. Website
> > > If an URL is provided, the consultant must mention their Debian-related
> > > work on the website. The Debian distribution must be mentioned
> > > explicitly, together with a link to www.debian.org.
> >
> > I do not like that at all.
>
[cut]
> Where in the Social Contract does it say anything about "seeking publicity"
> or "winning over new users"? If and when those aims get in the way of
> helping our users and/or free software (as they would here), then they
> are inappropriate and should not be pursued.
I have a feeling that the sites that *do* list Debian are the ones that care
more about our users, and not just google juice <:
--
[ Todd J. Troxell ,''`.
Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' :
http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat `. `'
`- ]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature