On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:28:19PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:15:00PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:09:19PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > Fortunately, that is not the case with Canonical. > > > > Yes it is. Fork and forget is Canonical's modus operandi (despite all > > the PR claiming otherwise). > > Being in a position to know, much more so than yourself, I can say that you > are mistaken. I can also point to thousands of lines of patches, > representing work funded by Canonical, which are now present in Debian or > filed in debbugs waiting to be merged. Being in a position of judging the facts without preconceptions, I can point to plenty more that aren't. > Handwaving and FUD are no substitute for facts. Nor are arguments from authority, or a carefully selected sample of facts. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature