Bug#158533: project: qmail is installed on murphy
On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 14:29, David Nicol wrote:
> So when is someone of the "qmail is unacceptable because DJB's
> in-practice license grant does not meet strict qualifications" camp
> going to write an equivalent drop-in replacement?
I don't think a drop-in replacement makes much sense. Qmail blatantly
disregards the FHS, and as such wouldn't integrate with Debian well. If
someone wants to spend their time on such a beast, well, more power to
them, but I don't think it's very useful.
As far as a functionally equivalent program goes, well, we have postfix.