On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 05:34:17PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> It also seems to be impossible to do reporting based on tags, though that is
> arguably a fault in the reporting tools.
Well, the source is available. Easiest way to do reporting based on
tags is to grep through /var/lib/debbugs/spool/index.db on master. It's
available via http via http://bugs.debian.org/~ajt/index.db atm.
> > The only thing which people actually do atm which the BTS doesn't really
> > support is to help coordinate QA work on bugs (eg during bug squashing),
> > which could be fixed by a "tag" that lets you say something like:
> > tag 123456 taken-by=ajt@debian.org
> This is part of what I suggested, but is again represented implicitly by a
> "tag" instead of explicitly recording the progress of the bug.
I'm not really sure what your issue with tags is. They're just an
implementation detail. If you'd like them displayed better in various
reporting tools, report a bug.
> qa.debian.org already has a system for tracking higher-level tasks and who is
> responsible for them, but it isn't integrated with the BTS.
?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgp1OgZBnD1QN.pgp
Description: PGP signature