[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1118314: marked as done (ghostscript: FTBFS: sphinx.errors.ExtensionError: Could not import extension rst2pdf.pdfbuilder (exception: No module named 'docutils.utils.roman'))

Your message dated Wed, 22 Oct 2025 22:11:39 -0500
with message-id <2810299.mvXUDI8C0e@riemann>
and subject line Re: ghostscript: FTBFS: sphinx.errors.ExtensionError: Could not import extension rst2pdf.pdfbuilder (exception: No module named 'docutils.utils.roman')
has caused the Debian Bug report #1118314,
regarding ghostscript: FTBFS: sphinx.errors.ExtensionError: Could not import extension rst2pdf.pdfbuilder (exception: No module named 'docutils.utils.roman')
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1118314: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1118314
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: src:ghostscript
Version: 10.06.0~dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs forky sid

Dear maintainer:

During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, this package failed to build.

Below you will find the last part of the build log (probably the most
relevant part, but not necessarily). If required, the full build log
is available here:

https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202510/

About the archive rebuild: The build was made on virtual machines from AWS,
using sbuild and a reduced chroot with only build-essential packages.

If you cannot reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I
am willing to provide ssh access to a virtual machine where the bug is
fully reproducible.

If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use
reassign and add an affects on src:ghostscript, so that this is still
visible in the BTS web page for this package.

Thanks.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[...]
Traceback
=========

      File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sphinx/registry.py", line 544, in load_extension
        raise ExtensionError(
            __('Could not import extension %s') % extname, err
        ) from err
    sphinx.errors.ExtensionError: Could not import extension rst2pdf.pdfbuilder (exception: No module named 'docutils.utils.roman')


The full traceback has been saved in:
/tmp/sphinx-err-mnxxkpjb.log

To report this error to the developers, please open an issue at <https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/>. Thanks!
Please also report this if it was a user error, so that a better error message can be provided next time.
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:64: execute_after_dh_auto_build-indep] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
make: *** [debian/rules:43: binary] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 23:08:36 +0000 Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> wrote:
> Package: src:ghostscript
> Version: 10.06.0~dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs forky sid
> 
> Dear maintainer:
> 
> During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, this package failed to build.

I was able to build using pbuilder.

> 
> Below you will find the last part of the build log (probably the most
> relevant part, but not necessarily). If required, the full build log
> is available here:
> 
> https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202510/
> 
> About the archive rebuild: The build was made on virtual machines from AWS,
> using sbuild and a reduced chroot with only build-essential packages.
> 
> If you cannot reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I
> am willing to provide ssh access to a virtual machine where the bug is
> fully reproducible.
> 
> If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use
> reassign and add an affects on src:ghostscript, so that this is still
> visible in the BTS web page for this package.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [...]
> Traceback
> =========
> 
>       File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sphinx/registry.py", line 544, in 
load_extension
>         raise ExtensionError(
>             __('Could not import extension %s') % extname, err
>         ) from err
>     sphinx.errors.ExtensionError: Could not import extension 
rst2pdf.pdfbuilder (exception: No module named 'docutils.utils.roman')
> 
> 
> The full traceback has been saved in:
> /tmp/sphinx-err-mnxxkpjb.log
> 
> To report this error to the developers, please open an issue at <https://
github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/>. Thanks!
> Please also report this if it was a user error, so that a better error 
message can be provided next time.
> make[1]: *** [debian/rules:64: execute_after_dh_auto_build-indep] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
> make: *** [debian/rules:43: binary] Error 2
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit 
status 2
> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
Reply to: