Bug#1118314: ghostscript: FTBFS: sphinx.errors.ExtensionError: Could not import extension rst2pdf.pdfbuilder (exception: No module named 'docutils.utils.roman')
Package: src:ghostscript
Version: 10.06.0~dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs forky sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, this package failed to build.
Below you will find the last part of the build log (probably the most
relevant part, but not necessarily). If required, the full build log
is available here:
https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202510/
About the archive rebuild: The build was made on virtual machines from AWS,
using sbuild and a reduced chroot with only build-essential packages.
If you cannot reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I
am willing to provide ssh access to a virtual machine where the bug is
fully reproducible.
If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use
reassign and add an affects on src:ghostscript, so that this is still
visible in the BTS web page for this package.
Thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[...]
Traceback
=========
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sphinx/registry.py", line 544, in load_extension
raise ExtensionError(
__('Could not import extension %s') % extname, err
) from err
sphinx.errors.ExtensionError: Could not import extension rst2pdf.pdfbuilder (exception: No module named 'docutils.utils.roman')
The full traceback has been saved in:
/tmp/sphinx-err-mnxxkpjb.log
To report this error to the developers, please open an issue at <https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/>. Thanks!
Please also report this if it was a user error, so that a better error message can be provided next time.
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:64: execute_after_dh_auto_build-indep] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
make: *** [debian/rules:43: binary] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: