[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#476126: Bug:#476126 hplip: postrm attempts to remove group scanner unconditionally



Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org> wrote:

Hi,

> Is hplip able to rely on libsane to add and remove the scanner group as 
> required?

Yes, absolutely. libsane has been using (and creating) the scanner
group for years now.

Also, when you create users and/or groups, you never ever remove them
with the package. Users and groups must remain on the system even
after the package has been purged.

> Looking through launchpad[1] I see that they are now using HAL rather than the 
> scanner group for access.  Is that relevant to debian?

I provide the HAL fdi file in Debian too, but HAL is not mandatory and
libsane still ships udev rules and will continue to do so.

JB.

-- 
 Julien BLACHE <jblache@debian.org>  |  Debian, because code matters more 
 Debian & GNU/Linux Developer        |       <http://www.debian.org>
 Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 
 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 




Reply to: