Re: ofpath vs ofpathname vs grub-ofpathname
On 4/16/20 8:38 PM, Romain Dolbeau wrote:
> Anyway - here's the result with your branch, the only difference I see
> is that 'scsi' & 'sd' are gone:
>
> #####
> dolbeau@powermacg5:~/powerpc-utils$ git status
> On branch mac-support
> Your branch is up to date with 'origin/mac-support'.
> nothing to commit, working tree clean
> dolbeau@powermacg5:~/powerpc-utils$ sudo
> ~/powerpc-utils/scripts/ofpathname /dev/sda
> /ht@0,f2000000/pci@9/k2-sata-root@c/@0/@0
> dolbeau@powermacg5:~/powerpc-utils$ sudo
> ~/powerpc-utils/scripts/ofpathname /dev/sdb
> /ht@0,f2000000/pci@9/k2-sata-root@c/@0/@0
> #####
>
> In case tracing the script a bit could be helpful, I attach the log
> from tuning 'sudo bash -x ~/powerpc-utils/scripts/ofpathname /dev/sda
> 2>&1 | tee /tmp/log'.
Hmm, I don't understand why it's showing the same OF path
for both disks.
Can you please show the result for ofpath again?
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Reply to: