Re: Announcing powerpc backport 2.6.12-6 kernel package for sarge
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 11:18 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:34:13AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:51:18PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > > http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6/
> > >
> > > I have done a second build, with the following changes, as 2.6.12-5.99.sarge2
> > > Only the first change is relevant, URL as immediately above :)
> > >
> > > * Change kernel-source build dependancy to
> > > kernel-package (>= 8.135) [!powerpc] | kernel-package (>= 8.135.sarge1) [powerpc]
> > > so that this package can be build on an unmodified sarge install
> > > on non-powerpc
> > > * Add myself and Sven Luther as uploaders
> >
> > Maybe we should move that stuff to the SVN, under dists/sarge/backports or
> > something such ?
Having backports in the name (sarge/backports or sarge-backports) sounds
better to me. When etch ships we'll have linux-2.6 under dists/etch
(under current conventions) - if we wanna add a backport of a newer
version, we'll have a namespace conflict. (Ok, that's a ways in the
future, but...)
They are also pretty descriptive names which should help avoid
confusion.
Reply to: