Re: 2.4 & 2.6 kernels, should sarge be 2.6 only at least for powerpc ?

To: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 2.4 & 2.6 kernels, should sarge be 2.6 only at least for powerpc ?
From: Jens Schmalzing <j.s@lmu.de>
Date: 30 Jun 2004 10:59:29 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] hhy8m55slq.fsf@alsvidh.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de>
Reply-to: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040630085122.GA23628@pegasos>
References: <20040627152938.GA807@lst.de> <20040627195546.GB29304@pegasos> <[🔎] 20040630085122.GA23628@pegasos>

Hi,

Sven Luther writes:

> Jens [...]  is comaintainer of the 2.4 kernels.

Nope.

Regards, Jens.

-- 
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz je pézqbpbe je djuz tqtaj!

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.4 & 2.6 kernels, should sarge be 2.6 only at least for powerpc ?
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>

References:
- Re: 2.4 & 2.6 kernels, should sarge be 2.6 only at least for powerpc ?
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: ibook 900 startx failure
Next by Date: Re: 2.4 & 2.6 kernels, should sarge be 2.6 only at least for powerpc ?
Previous by thread: Re: 2.4 & 2.6 kernels, should sarge be 2.6 only at least for powerpc ?
Next by thread: Re: 2.4 & 2.6 kernels, should sarge be 2.6 only at least for powerpc ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread