[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Xeasyconf?



On Thu, 2004-04-29 13:41:45 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
wrote in message <[🔎] Pine.GSO.4.58.0404291341210.17712@waterleaf.sonytel.be>:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-04-28 11:24:09 -0400, Ed Sutherland <digital@twcny.rr.com>
> > wrote in message <[🔎] 20040428112409042253.GyazMail.digital@twcny.rr.com>:
> > > I say "yes" to the framebuffer (have also tried "no")
> >
> > Say yes if your virtual consoles do run on framebuffers, no otherwise.
> > Use "dmesg" to see if your kernel enabled a framebuffer driver (if you
> > see a small little penguin in the top-left corner, then you're running a
> > framebuffer for sure; if it's missing, then you need to read the "dmesg"
> > output...).
> 
> Better, check /proc/fb

Ah, listed there, too? Nice. Need to check that on my one my VAX...

Thanks, JBG (Geert: remember invitation?)

-- 
   Jan-Benedict Glaw       jbglaw@lug-owl.de    . +49-172-7608481
   "Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
    fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! |   im Irak!
   ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: