Re: Why is quik statically linked?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 16 April, 2002 14:17, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Doesn't the actual quik binary just process quik.conf and set up the
> boot blocks? Like Jens, I don't see why this needs to be statically
yup, it sets up first.b and second.b, and the names are indicative of which
one loads first, after the OF gets init'ed. the second.b loads the kernel,
and other stuff.
> The boot blocks themselves are of course "statically linked", but that's
> another matter.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org