Re: ppp mystery
- To: Bruce McIntyre <bmcintyre@primus.com.au>
- Cc: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: ppp mystery
- From: Michel Dänzer <daenzer@debian.org>
- Date: 20 Nov 2001 01:53:33 +0100
- Message-id: <1006217613.7919.8.camel@pismo>
- In-reply-to: <20011115121214.A431@plato>
- References: <20010918112042.A863@plato> <200109180553.HAA00749@piglet.grunz.lu> <20011115121214.A431@plato>
On Thu, 2001-11-15 at 02:12, Bruce McIntyre wrote:
> * Michel Lanners (mlan@cpu.lu) wrote:
> > On 18 Sep, this message from Bruce McIntyre echoed through cyberspace:
> > > Pinging anything aside from localhost results in 100% packet loss.
> >
> > Have you looked at:
> >
> > - 'ifconfig', to see whether you got an IP address on your ppp0
> > interface?
> >
> > - 'netstat -rn', to check whether you've got a default route set up
> > through the ppp0 interface?
> >
> > > pinging say, www.google.com and running netstat gave:
> > >
> > > Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
> > > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
> > >
> > > The report was incomplete, and netstat needed to be killed.
> >
> > That's netstat blocking on nameserver lookups. Use netstat -n (numeric)
> > to avoid that.
> >
> > > Pinging a server
> > > listed in resolv.conf (a numeric address) resulted in netstat giving a
> > > full report (it goes on to report about unix domain sockets).
> >
> > Keep in mind that DNS lookups may take time.
> >
> > > I was stupid and did not think to pipe that output to a file. Switching to
> > > single user mode and back ( a desperate measure ) did not help, but cycling
> > > power fixed everything. Does anyone know what might be going on here?
> >
> > Without output of above commands, no....
>
> I think it is happening again... This time output of netstat -rn and
> ifconfig is attached. also the results of pinging some numeric addresses
> taken from netstat.
>
> I hope this helps,
[...]
> ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
> inet addr:210.50.216.137 P-t-P:192.168.84.41 Mask:255.255.255.255
> UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:3286 errors:1 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:2821 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:10
> RX bytes:2620221 (2.4 Mb) TX bytes:182797 (178.5 Kb)
>
> ppp1 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
> inet addr:210.50.32.108 P-t-P:192.168.84.9 Mask:255.255.255.255
> UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:52 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:51 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:10
> RX bytes:2043 (1.9 Kb) TX bytes:1942 (1.8 Kb)
Why are there two PPP interfaces?
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
> 192.168.84.41 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
> 192.168.84.9 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp1
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.84.41 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0
> ----
>
> PING 192.168.84.41 (192.168.84.41): 56 data bytes
>
> --- 192.168.84.41 ping statistics ---
> 10 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
> ----
>
You can't reach your default gateway (one of your PPP peers)...
> PING 192.168.84.9 (192.168.84.9): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 192.168.84.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=100 time=112.4 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.84.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=100 time=109.8 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.84.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=100 time=110.0 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.84.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=100 time=110.0 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.84.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=100 time=110.0 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.84.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=100 time=110.0 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.84.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=100 time=110.0 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.84.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=100 time=110.0 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.84.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=100 time=110.0 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.84.9: icmp_seq=9 ttl=100 time=110.0 ms
>
> --- 192.168.84.9 ping statistics ---
> 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max = 109.8/110.2/112.4 ms
But you can reach the other one. Making that the default gateway might
work. But the question is really where the other one comes from.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
Reply to: