Re: perl 5.6 problems
Previously Chris Tillman wrote:
> Is this right? perl is not listed as a dependency for apt.
I bet the problem is a warning or error from debconf. apt does
not use perl.
> Would it be reasonable to store and keep up to date a local perl package
> backup to fall back on if perl is failing?
No, that would basically mean working around a real problem.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: