Re: Geoff's gmon_start fix to binutil works! (fwd)
Christopher C. Chimelis writes:
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Yes, absolutely. You might want to wait a tiny bit, though; Geoff said
> > that he was working on something about hidden/protected support.
> Yes, I caught that message as well. I figure we may as well try it,
> though, since it'll be a week or two before we get a new upstream
> "real" binutils release. Considering that a glibc release looks pretty
> close, I figure I'd ask :-)
> > Actually, come to think of it, please upload - we'll see how the libc
> > regression suite looks...
> Will do. I'll start right now...
In gcc-2.95.2-13 I reverted the CVS updates from 20000313 to 20000220,
because the resulting libstdc++ wasn't binary compatible (apt-get core
dumped). Since then I didn't check again. Anyway, I upload a -17 which
fixes two missing files in the -16 packages.