On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 12:08:15PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 09:59:01AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > Of course. I was just wondering if and how the DRI stuff is currently > > > integrated in your packages. I see the *_dri.so modules are in the > > > xserver-xfree86 package - they are useless without libGL though, so > > > wouldn't they rather belong there? > > > > I've decided to put all XFree86 server modules in the xserver-xfree86 > > package as a tactic to prevent bug reports about being unable to find a > > module package, or "THE X SURVUR SHOULD DEPEND ON THE XYZ SURVUR MODULE > > BECAUSE SURVUR IZ BROKEN ON MY BOX W1THOUT THE XYZ MODULE. D00D!!1!1!" > > (I get lots of bug reports like this, because of course every single > > computer in the world is identical.) > > However, these aren't server modules. They are loaded by libGL for direct > rendering. So I think the xlibgl1 package is the logical place for them. Oh; this I didn't know, not yet knowing much about DRI. I'll re-examine this. -- G. Branden Robinson | You should try building some of the Debian GNU/Linux | stuff in main that is modern...turning branden@deadbeast.net | on -Wall is like turning on the pain. http://deadbeast.net/~branden/ | -- James Troup
Attachment:
pgpMyaYtVxpuY.pgp
Description: PGP signature