Re: gcc 2.95.1-2 and ld

[Sven LUTHER <luther@maxime.u-strasbg.fr>]

On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 02:30:24PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 12:50:08PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > 
> > i just downloaded the vim source package, and will try building it. I suppose
> > the binutrils package in experimental is :
> > 
> > binutils_2.9.5.0.10-0.1_powerpc.deb, somewhat older than the current binutils.
> > Will apt not complain about this and try to upload the package everytime i run
> > it ? Is the vim bug a binutils bug also ?
> 
> I beg your pardon?  That's the newest binutils available, except for
> the unpackaged .11 (through .13 now?).

Sorry, my confusion (i read 2.9.1.0.10) ...

and the above mentioned vim bug came from some older X 3.9.x libraries i had
lying around in the ldconfig path, and built with older binutils i guess.

Friendly,

Sven LUTHER