Re: gcc 2.95.1-2 and ld
On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 12:50:08PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> i just downloaded the vim source package, and will try building it. I suppose
> the binutrils package in experimental is :
>
> binutils_2.9.5.0.10-0.1_powerpc.deb, somewhat older than the current binutils.
> Will apt not complain about this and try to upload the package everytime i run
> it ? Is the vim bug a binutils bug also ?
I beg your pardon? That's the newest binutils available, except for
the unpackaged .11 (through .13 now?).
>
> > > Also i noticed there are lots of links from binary-powerpc to
> > > slink/binary-all instead of to potato/binary-all. Is this correct
> > > behavior, or should i fill bugs against the ftp repository ? (one
> > > example was (yesterday) text/sgmlpm or something such, it is the perl
> > > bindings to sgml.)
> >
> > Report a bug for this.
>
> Will do it, but first check if it was not solved yet.
>
> Friendly,
>
> Sven LUTHER
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
Dan
/--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University |
| dan@debian.org | | dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu |
\--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
Reply to: